|
In 1998 Harris filed a claim against
an investigative journalist named
David Marchant for
reporting these facts. Marc M. Harris v.
David E. Marchant
(United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida,
Miami Division, Case No. 98-761-CIV-MOORE), Final Judgment (August
10, 1999)….
… In its conclusion in support of
Marchant, the court
found:
The court’s
opinion listed some of the allegations:
“. . . 12.
Marchant learned from Shockey [John Shockey, former investigator for
the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency] that Marc M.
Harris (“Harris”), the founder and de facto head of the Harris
Organization, had operated several offshore shell banks in
Montserrat in the 1980s. These banks were subsequently closed down
in 1988 by British banking authorities for conducting “illegal and
fraudulent activities.” According to Shockey, these banks exhibited
numerous financial and fiduciary improprieties. One of the banks,
the Fidelity Overseas Bank, took fees from clients even though it
never performed any services for them. Another bank, the First City
Bank, doctored its financial statements. Finally, a third bank, the
Allied Reserve Bank, was issued cease-and-desist orders for
operating in the United States without authorization. . .
“. . . 33. On
March 31, 1998,
Marchant published an article in
Offshore Alert
titled “We Expose The Harris Organization’s Multi-Million Dollar
Ponzi Scheme.
“34. This article
made a number for factual allegations, which substantively accused
The Harris Organization of defrauding its clients and
misappropriating clients’ funds. These allegations specifically at
issue are:
a. That The Harris
Organization operates as a “Ponzi” scheme.
b. That The Harris
Organization was insolvent by $25 million.
c. That Harris
used clients funds to invest in the Infra-fit [a Chilean bicycle
manufacturer] venture.
d. That The Harris
Organization inflated the land value of the LARE [Latin American
Real Estate Fund, a Harris-affiliate entity] investment in their
financial statements...
g. That The Harris
Organization might be laundering the proceeds of crime.
h. That The Harris
Organization had issued $20 million of worthless preference shares.”
In its conclusion
in support of
Marchant, the court found:
“. . . 8. From the
time he published the initial article to the present,
Marchant had
evidence which provided persuasive support for the truth of each of
the allegations at issue. He spoke with numerous inside sources,
including Dilley (a consultant who served in a position equivalent
to the CEO of The Harris Organization), and outside sources such as Shockey, who appeared credible and knowledgeable about Harris, The
Harris Organization, and the financial situation within The
Organization.
Marchant was privy to internal financial and
management documentation which supported the information learned
from his sources.” |